Debating REDD+ and its implications: reply to Angelsen et al.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Robert Fletcher, ∗ Wolfram Dressler, Bram Büscher, and Zachary R. Anderson Sociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University, De Leeuwenborch, Hollandseweg 1, 6707 KN, Wageningen, Netherlands School of Geography, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Room 5047, Toronto, ON M55 3G3, Canada
منابع مشابه
Do trees grow on money?: the implications of deforestation research for policies to promote REDD
CIFOR is a leading international forestry research organisation established in 1993 in response to global concerns about the social, environmental, and economic consequences of forest loss and degradation. CIFOR is dedicated to developing policies and technologies for sustainable use and management of forests, and for enhancing the well-being of people in developing countries who rely on tropic...
متن کاملBenefits and costs of deforestation by smallholders: Implications for forest conservation and climate policy
a r t i c l e i n f o Deforestation is a leading cause of biodiversity loss and an important source of global carbon emissions. This means that there are important synergies between climate policy and conservation policy. The highest rates of deforestation occur in tropical countries, where much of the land at the forest frontier is managed informally by smallholders and where governance system...
متن کاملLearning from REDD+: a response to Fletcher et al.
Arild Angelsen, ∗ Maria Brockhaus, Amy E. Duchelle, Anne Larson, Christopher Martius, William D. Sunderlin, Louis Verchot, Grace Wong, and Sven Wunder School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5033, N-1432, Ås, Norway Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland Center for International Forestry R...
متن کاملWin–win REDD+ approaches belie carbon–biodiversity trade-offs
Recent practise has revealed that conservation interventions that seek to achieve multiple benefits generally face significant, if under-recognized trade-offs. REDD+ policies present prospective win–win solutions for climate change mitigation, rural development and biodiversity conservation. Notably, protecting, enhancing and restoring forests for their carbon sequestration services has the pot...
متن کاملWIDER Working Paper No. 2013/135 REDD+ as performance-based aid: General lessons and bilateral agreements of Norway
REDD+, when it officially became part of the international climate agenda in 2007, was an idea about payment to countries and projects for reducing emission from forests, with funding primarily from carbon markets. REDD+ has since become multi-objective; the policy focus has changed from payments for environmental services (PES) to broader policies, and international funding is mainly coming fr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
دوره 31 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017